Predictive value of cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging combined with maximum width of the temporal horn on 30-day mortality in patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

doi:10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2021.06.0011

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To investigate the significance of cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging combined with maximum width of the temporal horn on 30-day mortality in patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage (SIVH).Methods Clinical data of 45 patients with SIVH treated with external ventricular drainage (EVD) admitted to the hospital from December 2017 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.According to whether the patients died within 30 days after admission,they were divided into two groups:the death group (17 cases) and the survival group (28 cases).By univariate and multivariate binary Logistic regression analysis,independent risk factors were detected.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the predictive value of independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.Results Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging(OR=0.287,95% CI:0.124～0.664,P=0.004),maximum width of the temporal horn (OR=1.208,95% CI:1.011～1.443,P=0.037)were independently associated with death within 30 days betweenthe death group and the survival group.The area under the curve (AUC) of the above risk factors combined to predict 30-day mortality was 0.866(95% CI:0.731～0.949,P＜0.001).The sensitivity was 82.14% and the specificity was 64.71%.Conclusion Cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging combined with maximum width of the temporal horn have great predictive value on 30-day mortality in patients with SIVH.

Key words: Severe intraventricular hemorrhage, External ventricular drainage, Cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging, Maximum width of the temporal horn, Forecasting

摘要： 目的探讨CT环池分级联合颞角最大宽度对重型脑室出血(SIVH)患者30d死亡率的意义。方法回顾分析2017年12月至2021年1月我院神经外科收治的45例行脑室外引流治疗的SIVH患者临床资料。根据患者入院30 d内是否死亡分为死亡组(17例)和存活组(28例)两组。通过单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,揭示患者30 d内死亡的独立危险因素,采用受试者特征工作(ROC)曲线分析独立危险因素对30d死亡率的预测能力。结果通过多因素Logistic回归分析,CT环池评分(OR=0.287,95% CI:0.124～0.664,P=0.004)、颞角最大宽度(OR=1.208,95% CI:1.011～1.443,P=0.037)与患者30 d死亡结局独立相关,二者联合预测30d死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.866(95%CI:0.731～0.949,P＜0.001),敏感度82.14%,特异度64.71%。结论 CT环池分级联合颞角最大宽度对SIVH患者30 d死亡率具有较好的预测价值。

关键词: 重型脑室出血, 脑室外引流, CT环池分级, 颞角最大宽度, 预测

CLC Number:

Wang Ruhai, Hu Haicheng, Han Chao, et al.. Predictive value of cisterna ambiens classification of CT imaging combined with maximum width of the temporal horn on 30-day mortality in patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage.[J]. Chinese Journal of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2021, 34(6): 366-370.

王如海, 胡海成, 韩超, 于强, 黄好峰, 李习珍. CT环池分级联合颞角最大宽度对重型脑室出血患者30 d死亡率预测价值[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2021, 34(6): 366-370.

References

[1] Pinho J,Costa AS,Araújo JM,et al.Intracerebral hemorrhage outcome:A comprehensive update[J].J Neurol Sci,2019,398:54~66.
[2] 王永志,朱司阳,钱令涛,等.脑室外引流联合早期腰大池引流治疗重型脑室出血的临床分析[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2020,33(4):242~245.
[3] 周朝阳,朱荣岚,姜星星,等.神经内镜手术联合脑室外引流术与单纯脑室外引流术治疗脑室出血的疗效比较[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(2):77~78+81.
[4] 李光照,林彬,张开鹏,等.术前影像学指标对重度脑室内出血患者病情及预后的判断价值[J].临床神经外科杂志,2021,18(1):16~20.
[5] Mustanoja S,Satop?? J,Meretoja A,et al.Extent of secondary intraventricular hemorrhage is an independent predictor of outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage:data from the Helsinki ICH Study[J].Int J Stroke,2015,10(4):576~581.
[6] Hemphill JC,3rd,Greenberg SM,Anderson CS,et al.Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage:A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J].Stroke,2015,46(7):2032~2060.
[7] 魏建辉,田亚楠,赵旺淼,等.神经内镜血肿清除术治疗重型脑室出血的临床研究[J].中华神经外科杂志,2019,4(35):347~351.
[8] 胡海成,王如海,韩超,等.自发性脑出血术后慢性脑积水形成的危险因素及其预测价值[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2021,34(2):94~99.
[9] 张艺滨,郑艺芳,李光海,等.CT环池分级结合颅内压监测在颅脑损伤手术前后的临床应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2018,15(2):128~133.
[10] Mahta A,Katz PM,Kamel H,et al.Intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular extension and no hydrocephalus may not increase mortality or severe disability[J].J Clin Neurosci,2016,30:56~59.
[11] King NK,Lai JL,Tan LB,et al.A randomized,placebo-controlled pilot study of patients with spontaneous intraventricular haemorrhage treated with intraventricular thrombolysis[J].J Clin Neurosci,2012,19(7):961~964.
[12] 刘永飞,仇汉诚,赵贵锋,等.重型脑室出血脑室外引流与保守治疗出院结局的回顾性分析[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(29):2257~2260.
[13] Avanali R,Bhadran B,Panchal S,et al.Formulation of a Three-Tier Cisternal Grade as a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcome from a Prospective Study of Patients with Traumatic Intracranial Hematoma[J].World Neurosurg,2017,104:848~855.
[14] Zheng WJ,Li LM,Hu ZH,et al.Bilateral External Ventricular Drains Increase Ventriculostomy-Associated Cerebrospinal Fluid Infection in Low Modified Graeb Score Intraventricular Hemorrhage[J].World Neurosurg,2018,116:550~555.
[15] 胡海成,王如海,韩超,等.自发性脑出血患者术后不良预后的危险因素及其预测价值[J].中华神经外科杂志,2020,36(10):1057~1062.
[16] Trifan G,Arshi B,Testai FD.Intraventricular Hemorrhage Severity as a Predictor of Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Front Neurol,2019,10:217.
[17] Eslami V,Tahsili-Fahadan P,Rivera-Lara L,et al.Influence of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location on Outcomes in Patients With Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage[J].Stroke,2019,50(7):1688~1695.
[18] Morgan TC,Dawson J,Spengler D,et al.The Modified Graeb Score:an enhanced tool for intraventricular hemorrhage measurement and prediction of functional outcome[J].Stroke,2013,44(3):635~641.
[19] 王永,张尊胜,梁君,等.危重脑室出血患者血清VEGFR-2、FGFR-1水平变化及其与预后的关系[J].疑难病杂志,2020,19(2):113~117.