Effectof microvascular doppler ultrasound assisted clipping on cerebral hemodynamics and nerve function in patients with intracranial aneurysms

doi:10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2024.04.0005

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To observe the effects of microvascular Doppler ultrasound (MVD) assisted clipping on cerebral hemodynamics and nerve function in patients with intracranial aneurysm (ICA). Methods Seventy-eight patients with ICA in our hospital from February 2023 to March 2024 were selected and divided into MVD group (n=39) and conventional group (n=39)according to surgical methods.The conventional group was treated with craniotomy and the MVD group was treated with MVD assisted craniotomy.The surgical effect,National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score,Baethel index (BI),cerebral hemodynamic index (anterior cerebral artery blood flow rate,middle artery blood flow rate,cerebrospinal fluid pressure) and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The excellent and good rate of MVD group was 94.87% higher than that of conventional group 79.49%(P<0.05).The NIHSS score and BI index of MVD group were lower and higher than those of conventional group 1 week after operation (P<0.05).One week after surgery,the anterior cerebral artery blood flow velocity,middle artery blood flow velocity and cerebrospinal fluid pressure in MVD group were lower than those in conventional group (P<0.05).The complication rate of MVD group was 5.13% lower than that of conventional group 20.51% (P<0.05). Conclusion MVD-assisted clipping in the treatment of ICA patients can improve the surgical effect,improve cerebral hemodynamics,and promote the recovery of nerve function,with high safety.

Key words: Intracranial aneurysm, Microvascular doppler ultrasound, Clamping operation, Hemodynamics, Nerve function, Complication

摘要： 目的探讨微血管多普勒超声(Microvascular disease,MVD)辅助颅内动脉瘤(Intracranial Aneurysm,ICA)夹闭术对患者脑血流动力学变化及神经功能的影响。方法选取2023年2月～2024年3月我院78例ICA患者,按照手术方法分为MVD组(n=39)与常规组(n=39)。常规组只行开颅夹闭术治疗,MVD组行MVD辅助下开颅颅内动脉瘤夹闭术治疗。比较两组手术效果、手术前后,应用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、Baethel指数(BI)评分,通观察脑血流动力学指标(大脑前动脉血液流速、中动脉血液流速、脑脊液压力)变化、并发症发生情况进行对比。结果 MVD组手术优良率94.87%比常规组79.49%高(P＜0.05);术后1周,MVD组NIHSS评分较常规组低,BI评分较常规组高(P＜0.05);术后1周,MVD组大脑前动脉血液流速、中动脉血液流速以及脑脊液压力较常规组低(P＜0.05);MVD组并发症发生率5.13%比常规组20.51%低(P＜0.05)。结论 MVD辅助行ICA患者夹闭术治疗,可提高手术效果,改善脑血流动力学,促进神经功能恢复,安全性高。

关键词: 颅内动脉瘤, 微血管多普勒超声, 夹闭术, 血流动力学, 神经功能, 并发症

CLC Number:

R741

Zhang Xiaoyan, Wang Fenglan, GaoYanlei. Effectof microvascular doppler ultrasound assisted clipping on cerebral hemodynamics and nerve function in patients with intracranial aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2024, 37(4): 217-221.

张晓艳, 王凤兰, 高彦雷. 微血管多普勒超声辅助颅内动脉瘤夹闭术患者脑血流动力学变化及神经功能的影响观察[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2024, 37(4): 217-221.

References

[1] Bakker MK,Van Straten T,Chong M,et al.Anti-epileptic drug target perturbation and intracranial aneurysm risk:Mendelian randomization and colocalization study[J].Stroke,2023,54(1):208~216.
[2] 官测林,邱平,陈涛,等.显微手术夹闭与血管内介入治疗颅内动脉瘤的效果及对血管内皮功能的影响[J].中外医学研究,2023,21(24):42~45.
[3] 程晶晶,刘红娟.全面早期康复护理在颅内动脉瘤夹闭术患者中的效果观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2022,29(3):376~380.
[4] Li WQ,Wang SZ,Tian ZB,et al.Discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status:patient-specific inflow boundary may not be a must-have condition in hemodynamic simulations[J].Neuroradiology,2020,62(11):1485~1495.
[5] Poppenberg KE,Chien,Santo BA,et al.Profiling of circulating gene expression reveals molecular signatures associated with intracranial aneurysm rupture risk[J].Mol Diagn Ther,2023,27(1):115~127.
[6] 徐源,杨华,彭瀚,等.开颅夹闭术与介入栓塞术治疗大脑中动脉瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(11):84~87.
[7] 王岩,谢满意,张世坤,等.微血管多普勒超声和吲哚菁绿血管造影联合监测在复杂颅内动脉瘤中的应用[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2021,7(21):1861~1868.
[8] 许锡镇,吾太华,吴婷,等.微血管多普勒超声和荧光造影在锁孔手术夹闭前交通动脉动脉瘤中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(3):185~187.
[9] 邓文涛,战国巍,尹德民,等.显微镜下实施颅内动脉瘤手术的临床疗效及预后分析[J].中国医疗器械信息,2023,29(3):103~105.
[10] 中华医学会神经外科学分会神经介入学组.颅内动脉瘤血管内介入治疗中国专家共识(2013)[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(39):3093~3103.
[11] 宋海龙.血管内介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤患者的效果比较[J].中国民康医学,2023,35(14):155~157,162.
[12] 罗泽鹏,罗忠平,邬娜,等.颅内动脉瘤夹闭术联合rHu-EPO、依达拉奉对动脉瘤性SAH患者氧化应激、神经损伤的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2023,22(2):179~183.
[13] 陈常怡,肖庆,张昌伟.早期显微手术夹闭及血管内介入对颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者炎症反应、神经功能及血清HIF-1α、MMP-9的影响[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2022,19(3):23~26.
[14] 宁彧,蔡宏伟.显微夹闭术与介入栓塞术对颅内动脉瘤患者术中脑氧代谢及预后的影响[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2022,49(6):23~28.
[15] 郑洪彩,张羽,张凯.开颅夹闭术和介入栓塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效对比[J].潍坊医学院学报,2023,45(3):214~217.
[16] 袁运尚.开颅夹闭术与介入栓塞术对颅内动脉瘤患者预后的影响比较[J].中外医疗,2023,42(21):78~82.
[17] 邹成功,冯浩,陈兵,等.颅内动脉瘤夹闭术中动脉瘤破裂的影响因素及血流动力学参数的预测价值[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2022,25(4):421~425.
[18] 郑卜毅,王守义.介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗周围型颅内动脉瘤的效果比较[J].浙江临床医学,2023,25(1):78~80.
[19] 冷基勇,丛培雨,王心民,等.多普勒血流探测仪在颅内动脉瘤夹闭术中的应用研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2019,42(2):121~123.
[20] 徐婕,陈心怡,沈盼盼,等.经颅多普勒超声在急性前循环大动脉闭塞血管内治疗术后脑血流动力学评价中的研究进展[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2023,40(10):896~901.