Analysis of risk factors of ischemic complications after intracranial aneurysm intervention based on propensity matching method

doi:10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2023.03.0006

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To analyze on the risk factors of ischemic complications after intracranial aneurysm interventional therapy by propensity matching method.Methods The clinical data of 245 patients with intracranial aneurysms who were treated in our hospital from December 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively,including 54 patients with ischemic complications after operation.The mixed factors were balanced with 1:1 ratio based on tendency matching method.There were 52 cases in the ischemic complication group and 52 cases in the non ischemic complication group after matching.The general data of patients with and without ischemic complications were compared before and after matching.Logistic regression analysis was carried out on the matched data to explore the risk factors of ischemic complications.Results The incidence of ischemic complications was 22.04% (54/245).Age (OR=2.959,95% CI:2.009~3.910),smoking history (OR=3.196,95% CI:2.095~4.298),drinking history (OR=3.572,95% CI:2.252~4.891),diabetes (OR=3.873,95% CI:2.568~5.178),hypertension (OR=4.255,95% CI:3.041~5.468),hyperlipidemia (OR=4.802,95% CI:3.428~6.176),aneurysm diameter (OR=6.848,95% CI:5.233~8.463),preoperative aneurysm rupture (OR=7.501,95% CI:6.066~8.935),Hunt Hess Grade III~IV (OR=9.043,95% CI:7.636~10.450),and hematoma (OR=6.508,95% CI:4.928~8.088) were all risk factors for ischemic complications.Conclusion The risk of ischemic complications after intracranial aneurysm intervention is high.Age,smoking history,drinking history,diabetes,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,aneurysm diameter,aneurysm rupture before surgery,Hunt Hess III~IV,and hematoma are all risk factors.

Key words: Tendency matching, Intracranial aneurysm, Intervention, Ischemic complications

摘要： 目的利用倾向性匹配法分析颅内动脉瘤介入术后缺血并发症的危险因素。方法回顾性分析本院2018年12月~2021年12月收治的245例颅内动脉瘤介入术患者的临床资料,其中术后缺血并发症54例。以1:1比例基于倾向性匹配法对混杂因素进行均衡处理,匹配后缺血并发症发生组和未发生组各52例。比较匹配前后缺血并发症发生与未发生患者的一般资料,对匹配后的数据进行Logistic回归分析探讨缺血并发症的危险因素。结果缺血并发症发生率为22.04%(54/245);年龄(OR=2.959,95%CI:2.009~3.910)、有吸烟史(OR=3.196,95%CI:2.095~4.298)、有饮酒史(OR=3.572,95%CI:2.252~4.891)、合并糖尿病(OR=3.873,95%CI:2.568~5.178)、合并高血压(OR=4.255,95%CI:3.041~5.468)、合并高脂血症(OR=4.802,95%CI:3.428~6.176)、动脉瘤直径(OR=6.848,95%CI:5.233~8.463)、术前动脉瘤破裂(OR=7.501,95%CI:6.066~8.935)、Hunt-Hess III~IV级(OR=9.043,95%CI:7.636~10.450)、合并血肿(OR=6.508,95%CI:4.928~8.088)均是缺血并发症的危险因素。结论颅内动脉瘤介入术后缺血并发症发生风险高,年龄、有吸烟史、有饮酒史、合并糖尿病、合并高血压、合并高脂血症、动脉瘤直径、术前动脉瘤破裂、Hunt-Hess III~IV级、合并血肿均是其危险因素。

关键词: 倾向性匹配, 颅内动脉瘤, 介入术, 缺血并发症

CLC Number:

R730.5

Zhao Jun, Ma Yunyun, Fang Hongwei, et al. Analysis of risk factors of ischemic complications after intracranial aneurysm intervention based on propensity matching method[J]. Chinese Journal of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2023, 36(3): 157-163.

赵军, 马云云, 方洪伟, 范贝贝, 王钟玄, 陆青春, 吴胜波. 基于倾向性匹配法分析颅内动脉瘤介入术后缺血并发症的危险因素[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(3): 157-163.

References

[1] 魏敏俊,冯九庚,洪涛.颅内动脉瘤形成和破裂因素的研究现状[J].中华神经外科杂志,2015,31(4):424~426.
[2] 魏平波,陈浩,游潮.颅内动脉瘤相关致病基因研究现状[J].医学综述,2021,27(24):4832~4837.
[3] Kumon Y,Watanabe H,Tagawa M,et al.Relationship between deep white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative cognitive function following clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysm[J].Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo),2021,61(2):152~161.
[4] Jiang P,Liu Q,Wu J,et al.Hemodynamic findings associated with intraoperative appearances of intracranial aneurysms[J].Neurosurg Rev,2020,43(1):203~209.
[5] Dmytriw AA,Kapadia A,Enriquez-Marulanda A,et al.Vertebral artery aneurysms and the risk of cord infarction following spinal artery coverage during flow diversion[J].J Neurosurg,2020,134(3):961~970.
[6] 贾云玲,阮婷婷,刘利艳.颅内动脉瘤介入术后并发脑缺血的危险因素研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2022,37(10):1625~1627.
[7] Tsunoda S,Inoue T,Ohwaki K,et al.Comparison of postoperative temporalis muscle atrophy between the muscle-preserving pterional approach and the mini-pterional approach in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].Neurosurg Rev,2022,45(1):507~515.
[8] 边立衡,王艺峥,付建忠,等.未破裂颅内动脉瘤外科治疗指南[J].中国卒中杂志,2008,3(5):371~380.
[9] 中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会,中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组,张鸿祺,等.中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2021,18(8):546~574.
[10] DavidA.Greenberg,MichaelJ.Aminoff,RogerP.Simon,et al.临床神经病学[M].北京.人民卫生出版社,2015:140~145.
[11] Wang S,Liu X,Wang F,et al.Bilateral remote cerebellar hemorrhage following surgical clipping a ruptured supratentorial aneurysm[J].Br J Neurosurg,2020,34(2):200~201.
[12] Moscovici S,Candanedo C,Spektor S,et al.Solid vs.cystic predominance in posterior fossa hemangioblastomas:implications for cerebrovascular risks and patient outcome[J].Acta Neurochir (Wien),2022,164(5):1357~1364.
[13] 刘江,张云东,犹秋香.颅内动脉瘤差异表达基因的生信分析及免疫浸润的相关性分析[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2022,35(1):24~28,33.
[14] 蔡宁,陈泽军,邓引生,等.血管内介入治疗颅内动脉瘤的缺血性并发症发生情况及危险因素分析[J].医药前沿,2019,9(17):61~62.
[15] 杨忠庆,朴金伟,张卫东.颅内动脉瘤介入术后脑缺血并发症的相关因素分析[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2020,47(1):14~17.
[16] Li Y,Kim J,Simpson D,et al.Difference in imaging biomarkers between transient and permanent neurological deficits after endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms[J].J Neurosurg,2020,134(6):1861~1870.
[17] 赵刚,张锡武,江澈,等.颅内动脉瘤介入治疗围手术期并发症的危险因素分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2021,26(2):58~61.
[18] Calviere L,Bonneville F,Geeraerts T,et al.Intracranial aneurysm thrombosis precipitated by iodine injection may herald its rupture[J].Rev Neurol (Paris),2021,177(3):330~331.
[19] Taqi MA,Raz E,Vechera A,et al.Early experience with comaneci,a newly FDA-approved controllable assist device for wide-necked intracranial aneurysm coiling[J].Cerebrovasc Dis,2021,50(4):464~471.
[20] Foreman PM,Ilyas A,Cress MC,et al.Ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device:a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2021,42(4):720~725.