远程指导方式的居家康复在脑瘫SDR术后的应用分析

doi:10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2024.03.0003

立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 141-145.DOI: 10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2024.03.0003

远程指导方式的居家康复在脑瘫SDR术后的应用分析

徐金山, 李光玉, 刘炜, 贾莉, 刘宏波, 梁树立

100045 北京首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院功能神经外科(徐金山,刘炜,梁树立),北京昌平区阳光鹿童康复中心(李光玉,贾莉,刘宏波)

收稿日期:2023-06-01 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-09-24
通讯作者: 梁树立 301_1sjwk@sina.cn

Analysis of the application of home-based rehabilitation by telecommuting for cerebral palsy children after SDR

Xu Jinshan, Li Guangyu, Liu Wei, Jia Li, Liu hongbo, Liang Shuli

Department of Functional Neurosurgery,Beijing Children's Hospital,Beijing 100045,China

Received:2023-06-01 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-09-24
Contact: Liang Shuli 301_1sjwk@sina.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨痉挛型脑瘫(SCP)在单椎板选择性脊神经后根切断术(SDR)后进行远程指导居家康复模式的意义。方法回顾性分析了90例SDR术后居家康复的SCP患儿资料,使用粗大运动功能评定量表(GMFM)和儿童功能独立性评定量表(WeeFIM)量化术前、术后半年及1年的疗效,统计术后1年居家康复的相关费用和脱落率。其中,43例选择门诊康复指导方式(HR-OA),47例选择远程康复指导方式(HR-TA)。结果居家康复的HR-OA组统计结果:GMFM-66术前35.2±8.5、术后半年48.2±9.4、术后1年64.6±13.5,WeeFIM术前43.9±10.8、术后半年50.3±14.1、术后1年62.7±11.0。居家康复的HR-TA组统计结果:GMFM-66术前34.8±7.7、术后半年58.5±8.6、术后1年66.1±17.3,WeeFIM术前42.6±11.3、术后半年57.6±12.3、术后1年65.0±12.5。每组内术前和术后康复半年、术后康复半年和1年对比,GMFM-66和WeeFIM两项均P＜0.05;两组间对比,GMFM-66和WeeFIM两项术前P＞0.05、术后半年P＜0.05、术后1年P＞0.05。两组术后1年的康复相关费用分别为4.2±2.7万元、1.6±0.4万元,P＜0.05;两组术后1年的康复脱落率分别为44.2%(19例)、12.8%(6例),P＜0.05。两组患儿总体预后良好。结论在居家康复时,采取HR-TA方式要比HR-OA方式更具优越性。SDR结合居家康复的疗效是肯定的。

关键词: 居家康复, 远程指导方式, 门诊指导方式, 痉挛型脑瘫, 选择性脊神经后根切断术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the significance of home-based rehabilitation by telecommuting for spastic cerebral palsy(SCP) children after selective dorsal rhizotomy(SDR).Methods The data of 90 SCP cases undergone home-based rehabilitation after SDR,were analyzed retrospectively.The Gross Motor Function Measure Scale(GMFM) and the Functional Independence Measure for Children(WeeFIM) were used to quantify the efficacy before SDR,half year and 1 year after SDR.The related cost and the loss rate of home-based rehabilitation in 1 year after SDR were aggregated.Among all cases,43 cases chose home-based rehabilitation by outpatient assistance(HR-OA); 47 cases chose home-based rehabilitation by telecommuting assistance(HR-TA).Results The statistical results of HR-OA group were,GMFM-66 35.2±8.5 before SDR,48.2±9.4 half year after SDR,64.6±13.5 one year after SDR; WeeFIM 43.9±10.8 before SDR,50.3±14.1 half year after SDR,62.7±11.0 one year after SDR.The statistical results of HR-TA group were,GMFM-66 34.8±7.7 before SDR,58.5±8.6 half year after SDR,66.1±17.3 one year after SDR; WeeFIM 42.6±11.3 before SDR,57.6±12.3 half year after SDR,65.0±12.5 one year after SDR.The GMFM-66 or WeeFIM data within each group were compared of in preoperative and in half year after SDR,in half year after SDR and in 1 year after SDR,and P＜0.05 for all.The GMFM-66 and WeeFIM data between the two groups were compared of in preoperative and resulted P＞0.05,in half year after SDR and resulted P＜0.05,in 1 year after SDR and resulted P＞0.05.The related rehabilitation cost(unit:10,000 yuan) in 1 year after SDR was 4.2±2.7 for HR-OA group and 1.6±0.4 for HR-TA group,and resulted P＜0.05.The loss rate of rehabilitation in 1 year after SDR was 44.2%(19 cases) for HR-OA group and 12.8%(6 cases) for HR-TA group,and resulted P＜0.05.The prognosis was all good in both groups.Conclusion In home-based rehabilitation,Telecommuting mode is more advantageous than Outpatient mode.The efficacy of SDR combined with home-based rehabilitation is positive.

Key words: Home-based habilitation, Telecommuting assistance, Outpatient assistance, Spastic cerebral palsy, Selective dorsal rhizotomy

中图分类号:

R746

徐金山, 李光玉, 刘炜, 贾莉, 刘宏波, 梁树立. 远程指导方式的居家康复在脑瘫SDR术后的应用分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2024, 37(3): 141-145.

Xu Jinshan, Li Guangyu, Liu Wei, Jia Li, Liu hongbo, Liang Shuli. Analysis of the application of home-based rehabilitation by telecommuting for cerebral palsy children after SDR[J]. Chinese Journal of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2024, 37(3): 141-145.

参考文献

[1] Velde A T,Morgan C,Novak I,et al.Early diagnosis and classification of cerebral palsy:An Historical Perspective and Barriers to an Early Diagnosis[J].Clin Med,2019,8(10):1599.
[2] Einspieler C,Bos AF,Krieber-Tomantschger M,et al.Cerebral palsy:early markers of clinical phenotype and functional outcome[J].Clin Med,2019,8(10):1616.
[3] Sadowska M,Sarecka-Hujar B,Kopyta I.Cerebral palsy:current opinions on definition,epidemiology,Risk factors,classification and treatment options[J].Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat,2020,16:1505~1518.
[4] Handsfield GG,Williams S,Khuu S,et al.Muscle architecture,growth,and biological Remodelling in cerebral palsy:a narrative review[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):233.
[5] Tedroff K,Hägglund G,Miller F.Long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy:a systematic review[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2020,62(5):554~562.
[6] Nicolini-Panisson RD,Tedesco AP,Folle MR,et al.Rizotomia dorsal seletiva na paralisia cerebral:critérios de indicação e protocolos de reabilitação fisioterapêutica pós-operatória[J].Rev Paul Pediatr,2018,36(1):100~108.
[7] Novak I,Morgan C,Fahey M,et al.State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019:Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy[J].Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2020,20(2):3.
[8] Wang KK,Munger ME,Chen BP,et al.Selective dorsal rhizotomy in ambulant children with cerebral palsy[J].Child Orthop,2018,12(5):413~427.
[9] Daunter AK,Kratz AL,Hurvitz EA.Long-term impact of childhood selective dorsal rhizotomy on pain,fatigue,and function:a case-control study[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2017,59(10):1089~1095.
[10] Lundkvist Josenby A,Westbom L.No support that early selective dorsal rhizotomy increase frequency of scoliosis and spinal pain - a longitudinal population-based register study from four to 25?years of age[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2020,21(1):782.
[11] Josenby AL,Wagner P,Jarnlo GB,et al.Motor function after selective dorsal rhizotomy:a 10-year practice-based follow-up study[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2012,54:429~435.
[12] Josenby AL,Wagner P,Jarnlo GB,et al.Functional performance in self-care and mobility after selective dorsal rhizotomy:a 10-year practice-based follow-up study[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2015,57:286~293.
[13] Chan SH,Yam KY,Yiu-Lau BP,et al.Selective dorsal rhizotomy in Hong Kong:multidimensional outcome measures[J].Pediatr Neurol,2008,39:22~32.[14] Josenby AL,Wagner P,Jarnlo GB,et al.Functional performance in self-care and mobility after selective dorsal rhizotomy:a 10-year practice-based follow-up study[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2015,57(3):286~293.
[15] Cho C,Hwang W,Hwang S,et al.Treadmill training with virtual reality improves gait,balance,and muscle strength in children with cerebral palsy[J].Tohoku J Exp Med,2016,238(3):213~218.
[16] Lee BH.Clinical usefulness of augmented reality using infrared camera based real-time feedback on gait function in cerebral palsy:a case study[J].Phys Ther Sci,2016,28(4):1387~1391.
[17] Booth ATC,Buizer AI,Meyns P,et al.The efficacy of functional gait training in children and young adults with cerebral palsy:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2018,60(9):866~883.
[18] 国家卫生健康委员会.中国卫生健康统计年鉴,2020[R/OL].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohws bwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202112/dcd39654d66c4e6abf4 d7b1389becd01.shtml.
[19] Dodakian L,Mckenzie AL,Le V,et al.A Home-Based Telerehabilitation Program for Patients With Stroke[J].Neurorehabil Neural Repair,2017,31(10-11):923~933.
[20] Tyagi S,Lim DS,Ho WH,et al.Acceptance of tele-rehabilitation by stroke patients:perceived barriers and facilitators[J].Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,2018,98(10):e29.
[21] Silva TD,da Silva PL,Valenzuela EJ,et al.Serious game platform as a possibility for home-based telerehabilitation for individuals with cerebral palsy during COVID-19 quarantine - A cross-sectional pilot study[J].Front Psychol,2021,12:622678.
[22] Beani E,Menici V,Ferrari A,et al.Feasibility of a home-Based action observation training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy:an explorative Study[J].Front Neurol,2020,11:16.
[23] Nuara A,Fabbri-Destro M,Scalona E,et al.Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance:an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines[J].Neurol,2022,269(2):627~638.

远程指导方式的居家康复在脑瘫SDR术后的应用分析

Analysis of the application of home-based rehabilitation by telecommuting for cerebral palsy children after SDR

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	依利亚斯江·买买提吐尔逊, 姜磊, 冯兆海, 王西宪, 裴祎楠, 买买提江·卡斯木. GPi-DBS对节段性颅颈肌张力障碍的非运动症状与生活质量的疗效分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(1): 7-12.
[2]	李爱仙, 赵永彬, 田杨, 高菁, 任杰, 栾国明. 苍白球内侧部脑深部电刺激治疗单纯型肌张力障碍的疗效分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(5): 257-261.