血浆Lp-PLA2结合GOS评分评估动脉瘤蛛网膜下腔出血介入治疗预后的价值

doi:10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2023.02.0008

立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 100-104.DOI: 10.19854/j.cnki.1008-2425.2023.02.0008

血浆Lp-PLA2结合GOS评分评估动脉瘤蛛网膜下腔出血介入治疗预后的价值

姜海洋, 陈虎, 郭星, 张登文

710038 西安空军军医大学唐都医院神经外科(姜海洋,陈虎,郭星),中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第970医院神经外科(张登文)

收稿日期:2022-06-22 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-06-14
通讯作者: 姜海洋 jiudan19353@163.com

The value of plasma Lp-PLA2 combined with GOS score in evaluating the prognosis of aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage interventional therapy

Jiang Haiyang, Chen Hu, Guo Xing, et al

1. Department of Neurosurgery,Tangdu Hospital,Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710038;
2. Department of Neurosurgery,970 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force,Yantai Shandong,264000,China

Received:2022-06-22 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨血浆脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)结合格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分评估动脉瘤蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)介入治疗的预后价值。方法 2018年6月至2020年12月选取接受血管内介入动脉瘤栓塞术治疗的86例aSAH病人。出院时进行GOS评分;出院后6个月时对病人进行改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,0 2分为预后良好(n=63);3 6分为预后不良(n=23)。用酶联免疫吸附实验试剂盒检测血浆Lp-PLA2水平。用Logistic多因素分析aSAH病人不良预后的影响因素;受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析Lp-PLA2、GOS评分评估预后的价值。结果 Logistic多因素分析结果显示年龄(OR=1.834)、术前Hunt-Hess 分级(OR=4.123)、动脉瘤直径(OR=5.002)、动脉瘤个数(OR=2.567)、Lp-PLA2表达水平(OR=4.671)、出院时GOS评分(OR=2.678)是aSAH病人不良预后的独立影响因素(P＜0.05)。Lp-PLA2、GOS评分预测病人不良预后的AUC分别为0.793和0.725,联合预测的AUC为0.891。联合预测的灵敏度为87.23%,特异度为76.12%。结论血浆Lp-PLA2结合GOS评分对评估aSAH病人的预后有重要价值。

Abstract: Objective To investigate the prognostic value of plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) combined with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score in assessing the prognostic value of interventional therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).Methods From June 2018 to December 2020,86 patients with aSAH who received endovascular interventional aneurysm embolization were selected.GOS score was performed at discharge;modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was performed at 6 months after discharge,with 0 2 being a good prognosis (n=63);3 6 being a poor prognosis (n=23).Plasma Lp-PLA2 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.Logistic multivariate analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients with aSAH;receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the value of Lp-PLA2 and GOS score to evaluate the prognosis.Results Logistic multivariate analysis showed that age (OR=1.834),preoperative Hunt-Hess grade (OR=4.123),aneurysm diameter (OR=5.002),number of aneurysms (OR=2.567),Lp-PLA2 expression level (OR=4.671) and GOS score at discharge (OR=2.678) were independent influencing factors of poor prognosis of aSAH patients (P＜0.05).The AUCs of Lp-PLA2 and GOS scores for predicting poor prognosis were 0.793 and 0.725,respectively,and the combined AUC was 0.891.The combined prediction had a sensitivity of 87.23% and a specificity of 76.12%.Conclusion Plasma Lp-PLA2 combined with GOS score has important value in evaluating the prognosis of aSAH patients.Conclusion Plasma Lp-PLA2 combined with GOS score has important value in evaluating the prognosis of aSAH patients.

Key words: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, Glasgow outcome scale, Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, Interventional therapy, Prognosis

中图分类号:

R743.34

姜海洋, 陈虎, 郭星, 张登文. 血浆Lp-PLA2结合GOS评分评估动脉瘤蛛网膜下腔出血介入治疗预后的价值[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(2): 100-104.

参考文献

[1] Osgood ML.Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage:Review of the Pathophysiology and Management Strategies[J].Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2021,21(9):50.
[2] Tawk RG,Hasan TF,D'Souza CE,et al.Diagnosis and Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2021,96(7):1970~2000.
[3] 杨俊威,严雁.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的微创治疗进展[J].微创医学,2017,12(2):223~226.
[4] 黄利强,程道宾,叶子明,等.血小板内皮细胞黏附分子1联合血清脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2对颈动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性的诊断价值[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(2):170~175.
[5] 陈正林.脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2对缺血性脑卒中的预估诊断和疗效监测价值探讨[J].实用老年医学,2022,36(2):196~197.
[6] Lv SL,Zeng ZF,Gan WQ,et al.Lp-PLA2 inhibition prevents Ang II-induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis by blocking macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation[J].Acta Pharmacol Sin,2021,42(12):2016~2032.
[7] Ding CY,Cai HP,Ge HL,et al.Is Admission Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 a Novel Predictor of Vasospasm and Outcome in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?[J].Neurosurgery,2020,86(1):122~131.
[8] 卢子明.炎症反应在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血早期脑损伤的作用及治疗进展[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2020,25(2):91~93.
[9] 孙锴,王焱,王大同,等.Lp-PLA2、Hcy表达水平与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的关系[J].热带医学杂志,2019,19(12):1519~1523.
[10] Geraghty JR,Lung TJ,Hirsch Y,et al.Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage[J].Neurosurgery,2021,89(6):1071~1079.
[11] Pérez-Neri I,Diéguez-Campa CE.Taurine and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage prognosis[J].Postgrad Med,2018,130(8):669~672.
[12] Yang X,Cheng Q,Li Y,et al.Clinical Treatment and Prognostic Analysis of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage[J].J HealthcEng,2021,2021:1250334.
[13] 郭百海,丽周,殷丽娟,等.介入治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的影响因素分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2019,22(17):1905~1911.
[14] Muhammad S,Hänggi D.Inflammation and Anti-Inflammatory Targets after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage[J].Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(14):7355.
[15] Huang CJ,Zhou X,Yuan X,et al.Contribution of Inflammation and Hypoperfusion to White Matter Hyperintensities-Related Cognitive Impairment[J].Front Neurol,2021,12:786840.
[16] Yuan L,Hou L,Zhang L,et al.Clinical Evaluation and Test of a Modified Lp-PLA2 Kit in Diagnosing Atherosclerosis[J].Clin Lab,2021,67(8):111~117.
[17] Zhang X,Ya-Wang S,Ya-Lan Z,et al.Serum Lp-PLA2 Level Predicting Coronary Artery Lesions in Children with Kawasaki Disease[J].Heart Surg Forum,2021,24(4):E611~e618.

血浆Lp-PLA2结合GOS评分评估动脉瘤蛛网膜下腔出血介入治疗预后的价值

The value of plasma Lp-PLA2 combined with GOS score in evaluating the prognosis of aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage interventional therapy

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋景辉, 林志坤, 王文浩, 黄巍, 胡康, 罗飞. 可溶性凝集素样氧化性低密度脂蛋白受体1与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后相关性的研究[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(2): 105-109.
[2]	孟少林, 王伟, 孟凡然, 冯会玉, 何晨曦, 徐伟, 高飞. 基于多模态核磁共振成像脑胶质瘤术后调强适形放疗对患者自主神经反应的影响[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(1): 22-28.
[3]	范顺志, 程哲, 王大巍, 张辉, 束汉生. 机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中预后的多因素分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2023, 36(1): 42-47.
[4]	陈锋龙, 陈金龙, 张弋. 75岁以上人群破裂颅内动脉瘤栓塞术后早期预后相关因素分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(6): 321-325.
[5]	刘学武, 孙守元, 李富强, 戴志成. 血清褪黑素在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后中的临床意义[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(6): 326-331.
[6]	杜云, 王卫中, 刘梦, 姚萌萌. Notch3与TIP30表达对脑胶质瘤患者预后评估价值[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(5): 273-279.
[7]	张睿，齐戈尧，阿迪莱·阿卜杜热西提，程岗，张剑宁. 原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的预后因素分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(4): 198-204.
[8]	梁喜安, 黄永旺, 韦述志, 周元贵, 韦晗, 梁意能. 无牵拉经侧裂岛叶入路显微镜手术治疗老年高血压基底节区脑出血的效果研究[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(4): 210-215.
[9]	韩世文，洪文明，宣浩. 85例脑膜瘤患者术后临床结局和复发情况及其影响因素的分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(4): 221-225.
[10]	叶成坤, 徐奔, 牛朝诗. 老年胶质瘤的影像学及分子病理学分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2022, 35(2): 71-74.
[11]	林发牧, 邓燕婷, 梁玉明, 简志聪, 元少鹏, 胡建军, 李西锋, 段传志. 通道技术联合支架栓塞在合并胚胎型大脑后动脉的破裂宽颈后交通动脉瘤中的应用[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2021, 34(6): 340-342.
[12]	王志丹, 依斯哈尔巴拉提, 阿卜力克木·伊敏江, 迪里夏提·依马木, 巴高. IL-37在不同级别胶质瘤组织中的表达及其与预后的相关性[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2021, 34(6): 353-357.